SINGAPORE - In a move to obtain money to ease his gambling-related debts, a financial consultant with OCBC Bank hatched a plan to dupe five of its clients of $170,000 in total.
Hoi Wei Kit selected victims who were not technologically savvy and relied on his explanations when signing up for financial products, instead of scrutinising the necessary documents.
The court heard that Hoi would contact targeted clients to inform them they were eligible to sign up for a promotional time deposit account with an attractive interest rate of either 8.88 per cent or 11.88 per cent.
He would encourage them to take up for the promotional time deposit and meet him to sign the necessary documents.
In reality, Hoi had no intention of helping the clients to open time deposit accounts, and he made off with their monies instead.
On Monday (Jan 17), the 34-year-old Singaporean pleaded guilty to seven charges including five counts of cheating involving $130,000.
Thirteen other charges including three counts of cheating linked to the remaining amount will be considered during sentencing.
Hoi worked as a financial consultant with the bank from Oct 6, 2015 to April 1, 2018, the court heard. His responsibilities included selling insurance and various types of investment products to individuals as well as helping them open bank accounts with OCBC Singapore.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Dhiraj G. Chainani said Hoi had a gambling habit and was in debt by October 2017. He then decided to cheat the victims and use his ill-gotten gains to pay off his debts.
Hoi knew that to apply for a typical time deposit account, a client had to fill in and sign at least two types of forms.
One would indicate the details of the time deposit account to be created in the client's name, and the other would authorise the debit of funds from the client's bank account to the time deposit account.
As Hoi had no intention of creating a time deposit account for the victims, he let them sign only the form authorising the debit of funds from their bank accounts.
He then transferred their funds to OCBC accounts belonging to his associates.
The DPP said: "The accused would give various fictitious reasons to these associates as to why monies were being deposited or transferred to their accounts. The accused would then instruct the associates to transfer the monies to his own accounts."